Research Topic and Paper Outline:
TOPIC: A list of possible approved topics may be found in the course documents area, under Week One. You should inform your instructor about the topic you have chosen during Week 3.
ALTERNATIVE TOPICS: If you want to choose a topic that is not listed as already approved, contact the instructor giving a rationale for your choice of another area and asking for approval – Do this by the end of Week 3.
Potential Topics for Paper Remember any topic not on the list requires approval from the instructor by the end of Week Three. See the syllabus for specific instructions on the paper. Remember that each of the issues below is to be examined from the point of view of ethics and the professional practice of psychology
Who is the Client?
Failure to Warn/Protect
Liability In General
Geriatrics/Practice in skilled nursing facilities
Chronic Health Problems/Operating in the behavioral medicine arena
Consent to treatment by a child
Prohibitions against Disclosure
Authorized and Mandated Disclosure
Child and Elder Abuse Mandated Reporting Laws
Dual Relationships (non-sexual boundary violations)
Parents Access to Children’s Records
Child Custody Evaluations
Fraudulent Billing Practices
Comparison of State Practice Acts
Ethical issues with HIV+ clients and other infectious diseases controlled by health department guidelines
Psychologists and medication (consultation and prescription)
Ethical issues in family and marital therapy
Ethical issues in Supervision
Ethical issues in research with human participants
Ethical issues in the care and conduct of research with animals
OUTLINE: By Day 7 of Week Five, submit a one to four page, comprehensive outline, double-spaced, addressing ethical issues related to your chosen topic. It should reflect the major points or sources that you expect to use in the final work. See the outline rubric for guidance, under the rubric section below.
Your research paper is due by Day 7 of Week 9. IThe paper should be 8-12 pages in length (of text) and should address ethical issues germane to your chosen topic. It should be a scholarly document with appropriate citations and references per APA style (The paper must follow APA Publication Manual guidelines). You must support statements made in your research with references. Adequate documentation of your sources is mandatory. See the rubric for scoring criteria. The research paper should contain all aspects requested by the rubric for full points.
Outline for Paper due by Day Seven. SEE SYLLABUS FOR DETAILS
Due this week: Outline for paper- Day Seven
Submit the Week 5 Paper outline for your final paper.
By the end of Week Five, submit a 2-4 page outline of your topic. It should reflect the major points or sources that you expect to use in the final work.
Here is the grading rubric for your convenience:
Outline Scoring Rubric 20 points possible.
(15 pts Total)
1. Superior (15 Points): Includes all components of the assignment as specified in the syllabus, and is a submission of an approved topic. Literature cited is relevant to the core aspects of the assignment, and is listed within the outline under the relevant headings in which the information will be covered. Language is clear and concise, and easy to understand. The outline is well-organized and structured, giving the reader a clear guideline or map of the future paper. Reflects major points or sources. Uses terminology appropriately and is well organized. Follows APA format. Meets specifications for length, font size and margins. The material shows a thoughtful and sophisticated evidence of topic research and understanding.
2. Average (11 Points). Includes all components of the assignments as specified in the syllabus, and is a submission of an approved topic. The outline is not comprehensive, but sufficient enough to introduce the topic of interest with a general idea of the paper’s future structure and organization. There is minimal use of literature as supporting documentation. It is adequately written but may use some terms incorrectly. There are only minor errors in APA format. It meets specifications for length, font size, and margins. References are listed, but do not help shape the future format of the paper.
3. Below Average (8 Points). Includes some aspects of the assignment but may be missing a few elements. The outline is in skeleton form and is not comprehensive enough for the reader to follow, or to provide feedback regarding the future paper. There is minimal note of background literature, and/or it is poorly written with frequent incorrect use of terms.
II. References/Sources (5 pts. Total): Mentions Current Rules or references Standards
(APA, Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards, State licensing board)
Read Fisher; Chapter 6 Standards on Human Relations pp 113-169.
Bersoff; Chapter 5; Multiple Relationships; pp 215-270.
The establishment and maintenance of proper boundaries between psychologists and their clients have received much attention by the field. While all theoretical perspectives address professional boundary issues, the contributions of psychoanalysis and other psychodynamic schools of therapy highlight how important an awareness of transference and countertransference reactions are in professional relationships. Psychologists need to recognize that adverse emotional reactions can occur in their professional relationships due to a variety of psychodynamic factors. Thus, maintaining professional boundaries is a way of minimizing or avoiding the repercussions that can occur when adverse emotional reactions (i.e., transference) arise.
The power and influence held by the psychologist in relation to people who are clients, trainees, etc., underscores the importance of setting and maintaining clear boundaries. The potential for inappropriately influencing “subordinates” is high, as is the possibility of adverse reactions leading to ethical complaints. The goals of serving the client’s best interests and avoiding conflict and harm are predominant in observing professional boundaries.
The challenges of multiple role management are especially keen for psychologists working in small communities or with special sub-groups within a community. Because of overlapping social networks and “everybody knowing everybody else” in such contexts, the psychologist may find himself or herself in multiple roles such as that of “ordinary” citizen, professional psychologist, parent, and so forth. The ethics code makes it clear that we are not to avoid such multiple roles at all costs, but instead, to manage them in a way that we and others are aware of the “awkward” moments that we may face as we interact in these multiple roles.
The psychologist must be careful to avoid and/or actively manage a variety of potential role conflicts involving clients, colleagues, students, supervisees, etc. This session covers material that heightens awareness of various multiple role conflicts.
1. Define various types of multiple role relationships.
2. Examine the issues involved in providing professional services to close friends, relatives, and employees.
3. Discuss pertinent ethical concerns regarding socializing with clients, students, and others.
4. Analyze the intricacies of accepting and/or giving gifts to and from clients and others.