Question description

Details:

Chapter 2 of the DPI Project Proposal is entitled “Literature Review” and expands upon work you completed in DNP-820 in the Develop a Literature Review assignment. Synthesis of the literature in the Literature Review (Chapter 2) defines the key aspects of the learner’s scholarly project, such as the problem statement, population and location, clinical questions, hypotheses or phenomena (if relevant to the project), methodology and design, purpose statement, data collection, and data analysis approaches. The literature selected must illustrate strong support for the learner’s practice change proposal.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

• Locate the “DPI Proposal Template” in the PI Workspace of the DC Network.
• Locate the Develop a Literature Review assignment you completed in DNP-820.
• Locate the “Research Article Chart” resource in the Topic Materials.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

Use the “DPI Proposal Template” and the Develop a Literature Review assignment from DNP-820 to develop a draft of a literature review (Chapter 2) for your DPI Project Proposal. The literature review (Chapter 2) is required to be a minimum of 30 pages. You have already completed some of this review in previous courses. No less than 85% of the articles must have been published in the past 5 years. Articles selected must further provide strong, relatable support for the proposal.

Use the following guidelines to create your draft Literature Review (Chapter 2):

1. Using the PICOT question format, identify at least three empirical or scholarly articles (25 articles total) related to the theme in the PICOT question.
2. Use the “Research Article Chart” resource located in the Topic Materials as a guide to: (a) analyze and synthesize the literature into your paper, (b) state the article title, (c) identify the author, (d) state the research question(s), (e) identify the research sample, (f) explain the research methodology, (g) identify the limitations in the study, (h) provide the research findings of the study, and (i) identify the opportunities for practice implementation. For scholarly, nonempirical articles, state the article title and author, and provide a brief contextual summary of the article.
3. Identify at least three subthemes that relate to each theme (six subthemes total).
4. Identify at least three empirical or scholarly articles related to each subtheme (18 articles total). At least one article must demonstrate a quantitative methodology.
5. Write statements that synthesize the three studies for each subtheme based on the information you stated above. You will write six synthesis statements.

Rubrics DPI Project Proposal Chapter 2 – Literature Review 1 Not Present 0.00% 2 Does Not Meet Expectations 74.00% 3 Approaching Meeting Expectations Good 87.00% 4 Approaching Meeting Expectations 100.00% 75.0 %Criteria 10.0 %Chapter 2: INTRODUCTION TO THE CHAPTER AND BACKGROUND TO THE PROBLEM: This section describes the overall topic to be investigated, outlines the approach taken for the literature review, and argues the evolution of the problem based on the Practice Setting Need supported in the literature from its origination to its current form. (2-3 pages) Item is not present. Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. 75.0 %Criteria 20.0 %Chapter 2: BACKGROUND: The background section provides the historical overview of the problem based on the Practice Setting Need supported in the literature and how it originated. It further discusses how the problem has evolved historically into its current form. This section summarizes the Background section from Chapter 2. (2-3 paragraphs) Item is not present. Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. 75.0 %Criteria 20.0 %Chapter 2: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: This section identifies the theory(s) or model(s) that provide the foundation for the practice project. It also contains an explanation of how the problem under investigation relates to the theory or model. The seminal source for each theory or model should be identified and described. (2-3 pages) Item is not present. Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. 75.0 %Criteria 20.0 %Chapter 2: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE: This section provides a broad, balanced overview of the existing literature related to the proposed project topic. It identifies themes, trends, research methodology, design, and findings. It provides a synthesis of the existing literature, examines the contributions of the literature related to the topic, and presents an evaluation of the overall methodological strengths and weaknesses of the research. Citations are provided for all ideas, concepts, and perspectives. The researcher’s personal opinions or perspectives are not included. Item is not present. Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. 75.0 %Criteria 5.0 %Chapter 2: SUMMARY: This section restates what was written in Chapter 2 and provides supporting citations for key points. It synthesizes the information from the chapter using it to define the Practice Setting needs supported by the literature, the theory(s) or model(s) to provide the foundation for the project, the problem statement, the primary clinical question, the methodology, the design, the variables or phenomena, the data collection instruments or sources, and the population to be studied. It then provides a transition discussion to Chapter 3. (1-2 pages) Item is not present. Not all components are present. There are large gaps in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. Components are present and adequate, but there are small gaps that leave the reader with questions. Components are addressed clearly and comprehensively. There are no gaps that leave the reader with questions. 15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 15.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. 5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 100 %Total Weightage

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.